Jump to content

Joerg Hampel

Members
  • Content Count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Joerg Hampel last won the day on February 15

Joerg Hampel had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

15 Good

1 Follower

About Joerg Hampel

  • Birthday July 7

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.hampel-soft.com
  • Skype
    joerg.hampel

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany
  • Interests
    software development in teams

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. For one of our customer projects, upgrading from v1.0.2 to v1.1.0 resulted in an error when trying to build an executable from the project (downgrading to v1.0.2 fixed the build): I understand that we need to tidy our customer's project, having Caraya dependencies in the build is not what we want. The reason I'm posting here is that I'd be interested in understanding why this VI would break the build. Thanks, Joerg
  2. We use G-CLI to execute our CI tools, so we'd write back to G-CLI (and also to the front panel of the tool in case we run it manually). So the point would be to get the progress information back into the VI that's actually using the VIPM API. vipb.mov
  3. Building a VI package can take quite a while. For our Release Automation Tools, it takes about 20 minutes. Even though we build our packages on the build server now, it would be great to be able to feed back the progress of the build process to the CI system. As an example, the NI Application Builder API offers "progress bar" events, which you can register for and then show the progress details as you see fit: The VI Package Builder shows at least a few pieces of progress information in its status bar. Maybe these could be "routed" back to the VIPM API?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.