Alberto Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 Good morning everyone, do you have any performance tests in terms of time in transferring Vision Imaq using this tool? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VI Technologies Posted April 5 Report Share Posted April 5 (edited) Hi Alberto, The tool transfers class data (internally flattened to string) on the network stream, making it effectively not usable for efficiently transferring IMAQ data over the stream. You can of course by de-referencing the image data, stuffing it a class and send it but it would be inefficient because of the extra copies in memory. Network streams support IMAQ references and handle them smartly by accessing the image-buffers thus preventing extra copies in memory, which is more performant. I you would want to use this in combination with the added functionality of the Super Network Streams, I'd recommend to pull it from Github (https://github.com/VITechnologies/VIT-Super-Network-Streams) and modify it to support IMAQ reference instead of class data, rename to Super Network Streams for IMAQ and let us know how it went! 🙂 Best regards, Jeffrey Edited April 5 by VI Technologies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.