Marc Blumentritt Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Hi, I would like to see in future versions of VIPM the following namespace options: None: leave names as is. lvlib: instead of changing the VI names, place them inside a lvlib. Regards, Marc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Kring Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Hi Marc, We've gotten this request from others, too. I agree with you that there needs to be more options for namespacing VI, including no namespacing. Also, adding to an LVLIB is a great way of namespacing. There are a variety of considerations that make implementing these non-trivial (mostly related to building dependencies into the package). Rest assured that these are features that are on our radar/roadmap. Thanks, -Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.